|
|
| |
| Cattle
Biodiversity of India |
 |
P.K. Singh |
|
National Bureau
of Animal Genetic Resources
P.O. Box- 129, Karnal (Haryana- India)- 132 001
Email: pksinghmathura@yahoo.com
| Indian
cattle population is an integral part of the
agriculture. Thus the cattle occupy central
position and are basis of the Indian rural
livelihood security. The cattle biodiversity
in India constitutes 33 well-defined breeds
of cattle apart from non-descript types and
some lesser known breeds which constitute
around 75% of the total cattle population
(185.18 million as per livestock census of
2003). India is highest milk producing country
of the world and total milk contribution of
cows is 40% in total milk production of 90.7
million metric tones. The cattle and buffalo
account for more than two third of the total
output value of the livestock sector. Various
indigenous breeds of cattle in the country
are the result of thousands of years of selection,
evolution and development of the wild species
in the process of domestication suiting to
the local agro-climatic conditions. These
breeds are now losing ground due to stiffer
competition from other breeds and due to their
poor economic viability under the present
system of management.
The Indian cattle breeds were developed mainly
for agricultural operations therefore, majority
of these breeds belong to draft category (Nagori,
Bachaur, Kenkatha, Malvi, Nimari, Kenkatha,
Ponwar, Kherigarh, Hallikar, Amritmahal, Khillari,
Red Kandhari, Dangi, Bargur, Kangayam, Ponwar,
Siri etc.). The milk production of these breeds
is very low therefore uneconomical, if kept
for milk purpose only. This resulted in decline
of many cattle breeds in the present day production
system. The mechanization and commercialization
of agriculture has influenced the utility of
these breeds as draft animals. Dairy type cattle
breeds are Sahiwal, Red Sindhi, Gir, Kankrej
and Rathi. Cows of these breeds are high milk
producers but bullocks are of poor draft quality.
The dual-purpose cattle breeds viz. Hariana,
Ongole, Tharparkar, Krishna Valley, Mewati,
Deoni and Gaolao are fairly good milkers and
bullocks provide good draft power. There are
three breeds (Punganur, Vechur and Malnad Gidda)
which of lesser body weight and suitable for
hilly regions. The
cattle breeds of North West region adjoining
to Pakistan viz. Sahiwal, Red Sindhi and Tharparkar
have their breeding tract in Pakistan and
very few animals are available in the country.
The situation is critical for Sahiwal and
Red Sindhi animals, which can be put in category
of threatened breeds. The population of Tharparkar
is more than these two breeds but it also
calls for conservation through genetic improvement.
Due to the mechanization, the use of bullocks
as draft power has reduced resulting in to
steep decline in the population of the most
famous dual-purpose breed of North India,
Hariana, Rathi and Nagori breeds also do not
seem to have a bright prospect. Breeds in
the central India particularly, Malvi and
Nimari have also been exploited by introduction
of crossbreeding and have shown decline in
the population.
Dangi,
Deoni, Red Kandhari, Khillar and Gaolao breeds
in Maharashtra region and Gir and Kankrej
in Gujarat region have a better population
status due to their economic viability. The
Red Kandhari strain of cattle of Maharashtra
has also a very small population but it secured
due to preference of this breed as draft animal
by the farmers of the area. The Kangayam and
Ongole still have a good population and some
improvement programmes are going on. In the
last decade two small sized breeds have been
cited namely ‘Punganur’ in Andhra
Pradesh and ‘Vechur’ in Kerala,
which have a small population and are in threatened
category. Some of other draft breeds such
as Ponwar, Kherigarh, Krishna Valley and Bargur
cattle also needs immediate attention for
conservation.
Cattle
Population in India:
The trend of cattle population in India indicted
a decline of 2.8% during 1992-97 and 5.8%
during 1997-2003 with increase in buffalo
population during same period. This shows
that buffalo is accepted as the choice of
animal for milk in India.
| Category |
Population
in million |
Percent
Increase
/decrease 1992-97 |
Percent
Increase/decrease
1997-2003 |
1992 |
1997 |
2003 |
Crossbred |
15.22 |
20.01 |
24.48 |
34.2 |
22.3 |
Indigenous |
189.37 |
178.78 |
160.7 |
-5.6 |
-10.1 |
Total |
204.58 |
198.88 |
185.18 |
-2.8 |
-6.9 |
As per livestock census 2003,
cattle are about 38.3% of total livestock population
in the country (484 million). Therefore, it
is very important to make judicious use of this
cattle wealth in national economy. The population
trend of cattle has been depicted in the following
figure:
|
Utility
of indigenous cattle genetic resources: The primary
reason for cattle husbandry in India has been the
draft utility of bullocks for different kind of
agricultural operations. As per Singh (1999) with
the modernization of agriculture, the use of mechanical
power in agriculture has increased but draught animal
power (DAP) continues to be used on Indian Farms
due to small holding and hill agriculture. More
than 55% of total cultivated area is still being
managed by using draught animals against about 20%
by tractors. India possessed the finest breeds of
draught animals and bullocks of these breeds are
fit for all kinds of agricultural operation. It
is unfortunate that the DAP is not getting due weightage
when contribution of cattle to national GDP is estimated.
With the increasing demand of milk, some of the
breeds were improved genetically for higher milk
production and about 40% of the total milk of the
country comes from cows. Different utility of cattle
in India is given below:
1.
They produce motive power for agricultural operations
in terms of bullock.
2. They produce milk which supply
the essential nutrients to the farmers’ families
and cater the requirement of urban
population.
3. It provides considerable job opportunities to
the large rural population specially women and youth.
4. They produce fertilizer in terms of compost from
freshly laid dung. The dung is also made into cakes,
sun dried and used as fuel
in rural sector.
5. The skin of animals form basic material for tanning
industry.
6. The products and byproducts of cattle are used
in preparation of Ayurvedic medicines.
Origin, Distribution and present
population status of Indian cattle breeds:
The origin, distribution and present status of Indian
cattle breeds have been depicted in the following
Table:
Table: Origin, distribution
and present status of Indian cattle breeds
| S.NO |
Breed |
Category |
Breeding
tract |
Approximate
population |
Reference |
| 1. |
Amritmahal |
Draft |
Hassan,
Chikmagalur and Chitradurga districts of Karnataka |
25,000 |
Network
Project on AnGR-2000-2002 |
| 2. |
Bachaur |
Draft |
Sitamari
and some part of Madhubani, Darbhanga Samastipur
and Muzaffarpur districts of Bihar |
10,948 |
Network
Project on AnGR-2000-2002 |
| 3. |
Bargur |
Draft |
Bargur
hills in Bhavani taluk of Erode district of
Tamil Nadu |
NA |
|
| 4. |
Dangi |
Draft |
Nasik and
Ahmednagar districts of Maharastra |
1,08,197 |
Network
Project on AnGR-2000-2002 |
| 5. |
Deoni |
Dual |
Marathwada
region of Maharashtra State |
1,18,945 |
Network
Project on AnGR-1998-2000 |
| 6. |
Gaolao |
Dual |
Wardha
and nearby districts of Maharastra |
NA |
|
| 7. |
Gir |
Milch |
Gir hills
and forest of Kathiawar comprising Junagarh,
Bhavnagar and Amreli districts of Gujrat |
9,17,081 |
Network
Project on AnGR-1998-2000 |
| 8. |
Hallikar |
Darft |
Mysore,
Mandya, Banglore, Kolar, Tumkur, Hassan and
Chitradurga districts of Karnataka. |
About
20 Lakhs |
AHD, Karnataka |
9. |
Hariana |
Dual |
Rohtak,
Hisar and Gurgaon districts of the Haryana State. |
NA |
- |
| 10. |
Kangayam |
Darft |
Kangayam,
Dharapuram, Perundurai, Erode, Bhavani districts
of TamilNadu. |
4,79,200 |
AnGR of
India- Cattle & Buffalo |
11. |
Kankrej |
Milch |
Southeast
Rann of Kutch of Gujrat and Barmar and Jodhpur
districts of Rajsthan |
NA |
- |
12. |
Kenkatha |
Draft |
Bundelkhand
comprising Lalitpur, Hamirpur and Banda districts
of UP. |
NA |
- |
| 13. |
Kherigarh |
Draft |
Lakhimpur-Khari
district of UP. |
15,709
|
NBAGR Pilot
project- 2002 |
| 14. |
Khillar |
Draft |
Kolapur,
Solapur, Sangli and Satara district of Maharashtra. |
8.12
Lakhs |
Network
Project on AnGR-2004-06 |
15. |
Krishna
Valley |
Draft |
Solapur,
Sangli and Satara district of Maharashtra |
Approx.
250 |
- |
| 16. |
Malvi |
Dual |
Indor,
Ratlam, Mandsaur, Dewas, Sajapur, Ujjain and
Rajgarh districts of MP.and Jhalawar district
of Rajsthan |
53,700 |
JNKVV Research
Bulletin DRS/2002/01 |
17. |
Mewati |
Dual |
Alwar and
Bharatpur districts of Rajsthan and Mathura
and Kosi in western UP. |
NA |
- |
18. |
Nagori |
Draft |
Nagaur
and Jodhpur districts of Rajasthan. |
1.73
Lakhs |
NBAGR Research
Bulletin No. 6- 1997 |
19. |
Nimari |
Draft |
Narmada
velly in M. P. and some also found Jalgaon district
of Maharastra |
1.10
Lakhs |
JNKVV Research
Bulletin DRS/2001/9 |
20. |
Ongole |
Draft |
coast from
Nellore to Vizianagaram, Chittoor, Kurnool,
Cuddapah, Anantapur, Nalgonda, Mahabubnagar
and Khammam districts of AP. |
7341
in 60 villages under survey |
Network
Project on AnGR-1998-2000 |
21. |
Ponwar |
Draft |
Piliphit
district of UP |
10,667 |
NBAGR Pilot
project- 2002 |
22. |
Punganur |
Draft |
Chittoor
district of Andhra Pradesh |
In
hundreds only |
- |
23. |
Rathi |
Milch |
Bikaner,
Ganganagar and Jaisalmer districts of Rajasthan. |
NA |
- |
24. |
Red
Kandhari |
Draft |
Kandhar,
Nanded, Latur and Parbhani districts of Marathwara
region |
14,000 |
Maharashtra
AHD census |
25. |
Red
Sindhi |
Milch |
Karachi
and Hydrabad districts of Pakistan |
NA |
- |
26. |
Sahiwal |
Milch |
Fazilka
and Abohar towns of Ferozepur districts of
Punjab |
NA |
- |
27. |
Siri |
Draft |
Bhutan,
Sikkim and West Bengal |
10,000 |
AHD, Sikkim |
28. |
Tharparkar |
Dual |
Thar desert
Tharparker district of southeast Sindh in Pakistan |
NA |
- |
29. |
Umblachery |
Draft |
coastal
plains of Thiruvarur and Nagapattinam districts
of Tamilnadu. |
2.83
Lakhs |
Network
Project on AnGR-1998-2000 |
30. |
Vechur |
Draft |
Kottayam
distric of south Kerala |
In
hundreds only |
- |
31. |
Gangatiri |
Dual |
Eastern
parts of Uttar Pradesh and western parts of
Bihar(Mainly Varanasi, Chandauli, Ghazipur,
Ballia, Arrah (Bhojpur), Buxar, Chhapra, Sasaram
and Bhabhua (Kaimur) of Bihar.) |
67,000 |
NBAGR Pilot
survey |
32. |
Malnad
Gidda |
Draft/Mannure |
Maland
area of Karnataka (Mainly in Shimoga, Belgaum,
Chikmaglur, North and South Kannad districts) |
More than
10 lakhs |
AHD Report,
Karnataka |
| 33. |
Tho
Tho |
Draft |
Nagaland |
89,337 |
Network
Project on AnGR-2004-06 |
Some
Lesser Known Cattle Breeds are Vatakura and Kasargod
(Kerala), Alambadi, Pulikulam (Tamilnadu), Trinket
(A&N Islands), Bengali (WB), Binjharpuri, Ghumsuri
(Orissa), Kumauni (Uttranchal), Purnea (Bihar).
Some cattle strains like Frieswal, Karanswiss, Karanfries,
Sunandini, Jersind are also present but in limited
number at organized herd.
There
is nothing wrong with crossbreeding but it needs
to be implemented with caution. The need to utilize
between-breed genetic differences via crossbreeding
(where it is appropriate) is fully appreciated but
there is an urgent need to give greater emphasis
to the locally adapted animal genetic resources.
Indigenous breeds survive, produce and reproduce
in the environmental conditions under which they
have developed. Crossbreds can produce more milk
but they need more and better feed, and resources
to exploit the potential. There is not going to
be any major change in the production system-involving
medium to low input in foreseeable future. Hence,
under these conditions, locally adapted indigenous
breeds should be favoured. Further, relative variability
amongst animals for the traits of interest is often
very much higher in the locally adapted breeds.
This between animal variability can be exploited
for higher genetic gains through well planned and
executed breeding programmes. Breeding policy should
be framed as:
· Recognized breeds of
Indian cattle especially milch breeds should be
left out of crossbreeding programme to be improved
through selective breeding only. These breeds should
be used to upgrade local cattle in areas having
low availability of feed, fodder and other resources.
· Crossbreeding should be implemented
only in potential areas having availability of quality
feeds at relatively low prices, demand for cow milk,
low demand for draught animals and accessibility
to veterinary facilities. Only the non-descript
or low producing animals should be bred through
crossbreeding.
Artificial Insemnation:
Artificial insemination is a tool to implement
breeding policy in cattle and buffaloes in India.
India has the world’s largest A.I. infrastructure
consisting 73 frozen semen stations keeping around
2500 bulls and having capacity to produce 36 million
doses of frozen semen annually. The total AI done
in the country is something around 27 million during
1999-2000. AI for cattle and buffalo is one of the
most important services provided by State Govt.
Different AI centers and mobile units are also working
in the country by milk cooperatives and NGOs. The
growth in AI is steady, however the AI coverage
on a national level is around 12% and in many parts
of the country is far from satisfactory. The Govt.
of India has proposed to increase the coverage of
AI from the present 12 to 40 percent in the coming
10 years. State Governments have to ensure the quality
of semen from collection to insemination so as to
develop the faith of farmers in AI programme. Further,
the semen of extraordinary bulls/progeny tested
bulls should be used to get good results in succeeding
generations. In India, so far preserved frozen semen
of exotic breeds of cattle and only the important
breeds of cattle is available. The following breeds
of cattle has been taken up under AI programme so
far:
Amritmahal, Deoni, Gir, Hallikar, Hariana, Kangayam,
Kanjkrej, Khillari, Malvi, Nagori, Ongole, Rathi,
Red kandhari, Red Sindhi, Sahiwal, Tharparkar and
Umblacherry.
Rest of the cattle breeds should also be included
in AI and genetic improvement programmes of respective
states.
Present genetic improvement programme for cattle
and buffalo in India:
A new comprehensive scheme, National Project for
Cattle and Buffalo Breeding (NPCBB) has been formulated
with following innovations over previous programme:
1. Integration of states’ breeding policies
with breeding programmes for better implementation
of policy.
2. Developing synergies of all major players including
ICAR-SAU system, NGOs and Gaushalas.
3. Institutional reforms in organizations undertaking
cattle and buffalo breeding activities and more
autonomy to implementing agencies in the states.
4. Promoting use of registered quality bulls for
breeding.
5. Increased use of indigenous breeds for grading
up non descript stock..
6. Promoting breed organizations.
7. Improving quality and coverage of AI through
mobile AI services.
8. Programmes for areas covered under natural service
and replacement of inferior bulls.
Recommendations:
1. Accurate breed wise census of all the cattle
breeds and lesser-known breeds should be carried
out by the department of Animal Husbandry.
2. A Breed Registration Authority should be constituted
at national level so as to register all livestock
and poultry breeds.
3. The performance recording of field animals along
with breeding and health parameters recording may
be planned with the involvement of Government and
non-government agencies. The data and information
collected from the farmers must be accurate and
properly documented for future use.
4. Every State must develop its livestock breeding
policy, review and revise the same periodically.
The livestock policies and programmes to be adopted
by State should be developed by a group of experts
and thoroughly discussed with all stakeholders before
its release as government order. Based on State
breeding policy, species and breed wise breeding
schemes, breeding plans and breeding operations
must be framed and implemented.
5. The genetic improvement and conservation programmes
should be formulated and implemented. Immediate
action is needed for endangered breeds from respective
state government.
6. Recognized breeds of Indian cattle should be
left out of crossbreeding programme and should be
improved through selective breeding only. These
breeds should be used to upgrade local cattle in
areas having low availability of feed, fodder and
other resources. Crossbreeding should be implemented
only in potential areas having availability of quality
feeds at relatively low prices, demand for cow milk,
low demand for draught animals and accessibility
to veterinary facilities. Only the non-descript
or low producing animals should be bred through
crossbreeding.
References:
Singh, G. 1999. Draught animal energy research in
India. Proceedings of the workshop of Animal Traction
Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA)
held 20-24th September 1999, South Africa 344p.
|
|
| |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|